Welcome to iraf.net Monday, May 13 2024 @ 02:20 PM GMT
rjvo |
01/26/2008 06:44AM (Read 3097 times)
|
|
|
Status: offline
Registered: 04/21/2007
Posts: 134
|
I installed IRAF 2.14 on Linux/Debian and it works fine. But I have noticed that
there are unresolved links in:
(1) iraf/iraf/lib - some can be corrected by changing
iraf/iraf/bin -> bin.linux (not to bin.generic)
(2) simirar - unresolved links in:
iraf/iraf/noao/lib
iraf/iraf/unix
iraf/iraf/unix/hlib - some can be corrected by adding in iraf/iraf/unix:
as.generic -> as.linux
bin.generic -> bin.linuxI wold like to know why there are such unresolved links? Thank you.
|
|
|
|
fitz |
01/26/2008 06:44AM
|
|
|
Status: offline
Registered: 09/30/2005
Posts: 4040
|
The links are resolved when the system is configured for development (i.e. a "mkpkg linux" that resets the 'bin' link to point to 'bin.linux'). Most packages are declared to install any libraries in a 'lib' directory, but there is also a search path of sort that finds them in 'bin.<arch>' directories. The unresolved links are normal for a generic system.-Mike
|
|
|
|
Jason Quinn |
01/26/2008 06:44AM
|
|
|
Status: offline
Registered: 04/07/2006
Posts: 175
|
I just downloaded and installed IRAF 2.14 from the frontpage of iraf.net. The info that comes up when IRAF is says "NOAO/IRAFNET PC-IRAF Revision 2.14 Fri Nov 30 15:27:05 MST 2007". The date there concerns me. Does this version include the fixes for the IMIO interface routine?I also had trouble with libtermcap.so.2 again. The fix was to create a link to libtermcap.so.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Content generated in: 0.13 seconds |
|