Welcome to iraf.net Tuesday, April 30 2024 @ 01:15 PM GMT
rohit |
11/24/2008 06:52PM (Read 4208 times)
|
|
|
Status: offline
Registered: 06/01/2006
Posts: 86
|
I am using SPLOT to identify the wavelenghts of telluric lines by fitting a Gaussian (using the key "k" ). IRAF gives the wavelength value to 5th decimal point. I would like IRAF to give me to 7th decimal point. The telluric lines that I have plotted are precised to 11th decimal point. How do ask IRAF to do that? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
fitz |
11/24/2008 06:52PM
|
|
|
Status: offline
Registered: 09/30/2005
Posts: 4040
|
To get more precision you would need to modify the code and recompile, however the Gaussian fitting appears to be done in single precision floating-point so I'm not sure printing out any more decimals would be meaningful without more extensive changes anyway. As an alternative you might look at using the WSPECTEXT task to write the spectrum out as a (wavelength,flux) list and use 'wformat' for higher precision, the use a task like NGAUSSFIT (in the STSDAS.FITTING package) to fit it. Off hand, I'm not sure whether NGAUSSFIT gives you any more precision. I'm sure Frank will comment if he has additional ideas.-Mike
|
|
|
|
rohit |
11/24/2008 06:52PM
|
|
|
Status: offline
Registered: 06/01/2006
Posts: 86
|
Thanks Mike for your response. I was able to get to 6 decimal places by looking at the splot.log file. But I suppose one needs to compare. It will be good to see if Frank has any ideas. Thanks again! Rohit
|
|
|
|
valdes |
11/24/2008 06:52PM
|
|
|
Status: offline
Registered: 11/11/2005
Posts: 728
|
Hello Rohit,Mike is correct that the number of places of precision in the terminal output and the log output is fixed and cannot be changed at runtime. The choice of the number of places was made to fit output to a particular line length and also, as Mike also mentioned, because things are being done in real precision in this ancient task. If we were to revise it we would probably want to do things in double precision.The main suggestion I would make is to convert the plot to some other units, say pixels, before doing the fit. This may get you the precision you want. In particular, doing the fitting in pixels would get you the position in pixel to the limits of the fitting method. You could then convert the pixel coordinate to wavelength either by knowing your wavelength scale or possibly with wcsctran.Yours,
Frank Valdes
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Content generated in: 0.08 seconds |
|