Welcome to iraf.net Monday, May 20 2024 @ 11:11 AM GMT
stinker |
05/01/2009 07:41PM (Read 1674 times)
|
|
|
Status: offline
Registered: 03/21/2009
Posts: 3
|
Hi all, I'm using psfmatch -- pretty much out of the box, which is likely to be the problem. OK, I'm doing the obvious stuff, but around my brightest stars, I get small sections of negative values. They are always offset from the centre of the stars either due-x or due y. I'm using convolution mode = image. Does anyone have any idea about what the origin of this problem could be? Right now, figuring it out seems beyond me. Cheers, and thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
raybutler |
05/01/2009 07:41PM
|
|
|
Status: offline
Registered: 06/24/2008
Posts: 7
|
It's been several years since I used psfmatch, so from memory...I expect that what is happening is due to the limitations of its use of *pre-extracted* PSFs from somewhere else (you're probably giving it PSFs from DAOphot?). Have a close look at your PSF...does it have any negative residuals? Not to disrespect the IRAF/immatch package - which pioneered the way in 1995 - but you can get significantly better results for this kind of image-matching and subtraction work if you use Alard's ISIS package, first released in 1999. ISIS is inherently both more accurate and based on a smarter, more integrated algorithm. It's the industry standard. Although it's stand-alone, not an IRAF addon package, you can feasibily embed calls to it from within IRAF scripts if that's what you want to do.
Dr. Ray Butler
School of Physics (Lecturer) | Centre for Astronomy
National University of Ireland - Galway, Ireland
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Content generated in: 0.08 seconds |
|