Welcome to iraf.net Friday, May 17 2024 @ 10:25 AM GMT
Gaba_p |
04/03/2009 12:04AM (Read 2688 times)
|
|
|
Status: offline
Registered: 10/10/2008
Posts: 104
|
Hi everybody,I'm working with frames with an unusually large FWHM: around 10-11 pixels. I'm following the 'A user's Guide to Stellar CCD Photometry with IRAF' by Massey & Davis (1992). I'm using a script I wrote, but I can't seem to substract the PSF stars and their neighbours cleanly, no matter what I try to do. Bellow I transcript the steps I follow and the parameter values I use (I've tried several small variations of this parameters values, with no satisfying results):1) Input of the following parameters:-[b:2af3e38604]smean[/b:2af3e38604] = 'Sky mean value' (obtained by: imexa + 'm' key over a clear sky patch. The value I've used is around 16)
-[b:2af3e38604]delta[/b:2af3e38604] = sqrt(smean*gain + rdnoise*rdnoise)/gain (Gain = 2.1, Rdnoise = 8)
-findpars.[b:2af3e38604]threshold[/b:2af3e38604] = 3.5*delta
-datapars.[b:2af3e38604]fwhmpsf[/b:2af3e38604] = 'typical FWHM value' (around 10-11 pixels)
-datapars.[b:2af3e38604]sigma[/b:2af3e38604] = 'SSTDEV value' (around 2)
-datapars.[b:2af3e38604]datamin[/b:2af3e38604] = smean -3*delta
-datapars.[b:2af3e38604]datamax[/b:2af3e38604] = 64000
-datapars.[b:2af3e38604]noise[/b:2af3e38604] = "poisson"
-daopars.[b:2af3e38604]psfrad[/b:2af3e38604] = 'radius of the larger unsaturated PSF star' (I've used mostly something around 30 pixels)
-daopars.[b:2af3e38604]fitrad[/b:2af3e38604] = 'typical FWHM value'2) Daofind run3) Input of the following parameters:-unlearn [b:2af3e38604]centerpars[/b:2af3e38604]
-unlearn [b:2af3e38604]fitskypars[/b:2af3e38604]
-unlearn [b:2af3e38604]photpars[/b:2af3e38604]
-unlearn [b:2af3e38604]psf[/b:2af3e38604]
-photpars.[b:2af3e38604]apertures [/b:2af3e38604]= 'typical FWHM value'4) Phot run5) PSF stars selection6) PSF run7) Input of the following parameters:-daopars.[b:2af3e38604]psfrad [/b:2af3e38604]= psfrad - fitrad ('radius of the larger unsaturated PSF star' - 'typical FWHM value'. I've been useing this values: 30 - 10 = 20)8) Nstar run9) Substar runAt this point I should have a 'name.sub.1.fits' frame with no PSF stars or their neighbours (according to Massey's guide), but I don't. The closest I get is a horribly substracted frame. I'm thinking there must be something wrong with the parameter values I use, but I can't figure out which ones.Any help will be very much appreciated!Gabriel
|
|
|
|
valdes |
04/03/2009 12:04AM
|
|
|
Status: offline
Registered: 11/11/2005
Posts: 728
|
Hello,I'm afraid I don't have anything to add. Massey is the expert here. I am responding mostly to for us to know that at least you got an acknowledgement. I hope you have made progress. In many cases you just have to experiment with the parameters to get the best result you can.Yours,
Frank Valdes
|
|
|
|
Gaba_p |
04/03/2009 12:04AM
|
|
|
Status: offline
Registered: 10/10/2008
Posts: 104
|
Thanks anyway for your answer Frank.Cheers!Gabriel
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Content generated in: 0.09 seconds |
|