Welcome to iraf.net Friday, May 17 2024 @ 06:48 AM GMT


 Forum Index > Help Desk > Applications New Topic Post Reply
 scombine and odcombine -- sum versus median
   
jkwerk
 02/07/2008 05:15AM (Read 2424 times)  
+----
Newbie

Status: offline


Registered: 04/25/2007
Posts: 3
Hello, When combining 3 different spectra of the the same object (scombine or odcombine), the (summed/averaged -- it doesn't matter) output "combined" spectrum looks basically exactly the same as just ONE of the input spectra (i.e. same noise and signal levels). Strangely, the cosmic ray rejection algorithm works perfectly, but it appears that the combining isn't doing so well. I read a thread about WCS display units being different from actual units of the spectrum causing problems with spectral addition (in splot), and wonder if that wouldn't cause what I'm seeing. It's hard for me to tell, and the fix provided on that forum seemed to be exclusively for splot. Here's what one of the headers of my one-d spectra looks like: SIMPLE = T / Fits standard
BITPIX = -32 / Bits per pixel
NAXIS = 1 / Number of axes
NAXIS1 = 4802 / Axis length
EXTEND = F / File may contain extensions
ORIGIN = 'NOAO-IRAF FITS Image Kernel July 2003' / FITS file originator
OBJECT = 'h2d ' / Name of the object observed
DATE = '2008-02-06T23:53:05' / Date FITS file was generated
IRAF-TLM= '18:53:05 (06/02/2008)' / Time of last modification
CTYPE1 = 'LINEAR '
WAT0_001= 'system=equispec'
WAT1_001= 'wtype=linear label=Wavelength units=Angstroms'
CRVAL1 = 3000.
CDELT1 = 0.75
CD1_1 = 0.75
CRPIX1 = 1.
DC-FLAG = 0
SLITLEN = 60 / slit length in pixels
SLITTYPE= 2 / Type of aperture
CNTRLINE= 32 / Spectrm central row
SLITNUM = 14 / Slit number
AIRMASS = 1.48500 /start airmass
EPOCH = 2008.03620000 /
EXPTIME = 3000.00000000 /exposure time (sec)
LC-TIME = '03:13:36' /local time
UT-TIME = '06:13:36' /
UT-END = '07:03:36' /
DATE-OBS= '2008-01-14' /
RA = ' 09:25:31.7' /
DEC = '-76:38:12.2' /
RA-D = 141.382250000 /ra-degrees
DEC-D = -76.6367222000 /dec-degrees
SITENAME= 'LCO ' /
EQUINOX = 2000.00000000 /
ST = 32596.8 /
IMCMB001= 'h2d_3073_2spec.fits'
IMCMB002= 'h2d_3074_2spec.fits'
IMCMB003= 'h2d_3075_2spec.fits'
NCOMBINE= 3
BANDID1 = 'spectrum: background fit, weights none, clean no'
APNUM1 = '1 1 27.28 39.28'
WCSDIM = 1
LTM1_1 = 1. The 2-d combined image (from which this one was extracted) had different header components -- most notably: CTYPE1 = 'LINEAR '
CTYPE2 = 'LINEAR '
WAT0_001= 'system=world'
WAT1_001= 'wtype=linear label=Wavelength units=Angstroms'
WAT2_001= 'wtype=linear' Thanks for the consideration. I hope I've been able to explain the problem well through my confusion and frustration, but if not, I'll happily try to be clearer. -Jess

 
Profile Email
 Quote
valdes
 02/07/2008 05:15AM  
+++++
Active Member

Status: offline


Registered: 11/11/2005
Posts: 728
Hi Jess,I'm sorry for the frustration. If you could send a listing of the parameters and the command line you use I could try and see what is happening. I can use your header to make three artificial spectra with the same dispersion info. If you think it might be significant you could send header listings of the other two spectra.Yours,
Frank Valdes

 
Profile Email
 Quote
   
Content generated in: 0.08 seconds
New Topic Post Reply

Normal Topic Normal Topic
Sticky Topic Sticky Topic
Locked Topic Locked Topic
New Post New Post
Sticky Topic W/ New Post Sticky Topic W/ New Post
Locked Topic W/ New Post Locked Topic W/ New Post
View Anonymous Posts 
Anonymous users can post 
Filtered HTML Allowed 
Censored Content 
dog allergies remedies cialis 20 mg chilblain remedies


Privacy Policy
Terms of Use

User Functions

Login