>From jhwu@ns.bao.ac.cn Wed May 21 20:18:57 2003
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 11:11:28 +0800 (CST)
From: Wu Jianghua <jhwu@bao.ac.cn>
To: Frank Valdes <valdes@noao.edu>
Subject: Re: Spectral line labelHi, Frank,Thank you very much for your email. I tried again and the procedure
you described does work. And I also find that '\\' should be used in
spectool while '\' should be used in splot when using 'T' to input
text. (Would you please unify them?
). The hardcopy is indeed
different from the screen show.It's really a pitty that we could not change the size of the axe labels.
I have tried many time in spectool -- view -- graph spectra, changing
the mark size, but it does not work. I once wondered whether I had
made any mistake.On the question on \gamma and \chi. Mike promised to send me a patch
to fix the problem. Having got so many help from you two I really owe
you. Thank you very much!Could I give you a comment on spectool? I find that the left click of
the mouse (to restore full range of spectrum) is in fact very
inconvenient. We use spectool to analyze the spectra or to produce
hardcopies for publications. We usually want to show only parts of the
spectra and we can use :/xwin ... & :/ywin (or View -- Contral panel
-- Pan) to change ranges of wavelengths and fluxes. Some operations
may be done in other windows. But when we want to change back to (just
lift) the spectrum window and give a left mouse click as usual, the
spectrum is restored to the full range! All the range changes are lost!
Then we have to re-change the range of the spectrum to show what we want.
The left mouse click function in spectool seems unnecessary. Of course,
It is just my personal comment. I do not know how other users think
about it.Bese wishes,
Jianghua
>From valdes@noao.edu Wed May 28 11:07:16 2003
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 11:07:13 -0700 (MST)
From: Frank Valdes <valdes@noao.edu>
To: jhwu@bao.ac.cn
Subject: Re: Spectral line labelHi Jianghua> It's really a pitty that we could not change the size of the axe labels.Yes it would be nice to allow changing text size. The only response
I can give is that SPECTOOL is so complex and has so many parameters
and functions that some things were left out. Note that you can change
the text size for the hardcopy by modifying the graphcap file (a file
describing the different capabilities and types of devices). This would
affect all IRAF tasks. If you want directions how to do this we can
send it.> I have tried many time in spectool -- view -- graph spectra, changing
> the mark size, but it does not work. I once wondered whether I had
> made any mistake.The mark size only affects when you plot the spectrum with marks rather
than lines. So you would need to also change "Type" to "box" (or other
symbol) from "line1". When plotting with symbols (other than point)
you can then make the simples larger or smaller in each axis.> Could I give you a comment on spectool? I find that the left click of
> the mouse (to restore full range of spectrum) is in fact very
> inconvenient. We use spectool to analyze the spectra or to produce
> hardcopies for publications. We usually want to show only parts of the
> spectra and we can use :/xwin ... & :/ywin (or View -- Contral panel
> -- Pan) to change ranges of wavelengths and fluxes. Some operations
> may be done in other windows. But when we want to change back to (just
> lift) the spectrum window and give a left mouse click as usual, the
> spectrum is restored to the full range! All the range changes are lost!
> Then we have to re-change the range of the spectrum to show what we want.
> The left mouse click function in spectool seems unnecessary. Of course,
> It is just my personal comment. I do not know how other users think
> about it.I actually find this feature very convenient. But it is dependent on
how you have your X-window manager configured. I have "focus follows
mouse" so I don't have to click to enter a window and I also use
"front" and "back" function keys to raise and lower windows. However,
if you click on the title bar (again window manager dependent) this
should not be the same as a click in the data part of the window. I
will keep your suggestions in mind if I ever go back to improve SPECTOOL.Yours,
Frank