Welcome to iraf.net Sunday, May 19 2024 @ 11:42 PM GMT


 Forum Index > Archives > Sitemail Archives
 "onedspec" question (fwd)
   
Anonymous: Guest
 06/07/1999 05:57PM (Read 245 times)  



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 15:38:00 +0100 (BST)
From: P N Werner <P.Werner@bristol.ac.uk>
To: Matthew Cheselka <cheselka@noao.edu>
Subject: re: "onedspec" questionDear MatthewThank you very much for your reply. I will try this.I now have another question, this time regarding the 'background' task in
the 'longslit' package. I don't seem to be able to get satisfactory
background subtraction near strong night-sky lines. No matter how much I
play around with the various parameters (fitting function, fitting order,
high and low sigma-rejection, ...) I *always* have really obvious skyline
residuals left in my background subtracted image. This is not an enormous
problem, as I can mask out the affected regions if I know where they are,
but it is still slightly annoying. Do you think I am doing something
wrong, or is 'background' generally thought to be unsatisfactory near
prominent night-sky lines? Regards,
PierreP.S.: I'm sorry to hassle you with these questions, but I am part of a
very small astrophysics group, and I am one of the only people who use
IRAF for optical spectroscopy, so there aren't many people around who can
give me advice.

 
Anonymous: Guest
 06/07/1999 05:57PM  



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 15:38:00 +0100 (BST)
From: P N Werner <P.Werner@bristol.ac.uk>
To: Matthew Cheselka <cheselka@noao.edu>
Subject: re: "onedspec" questionDear MatthewThank you very much for your reply. I will try this.I now have another question, this time regarding the 'background' task in
the 'longslit' package. I don't seem to be able to get satisfactory
background subtraction near strong night-sky lines. No matter how much I
play around with the various parameters (fitting function, fitting order,
high and low sigma-rejection, ...) I *always* have really obvious skyline
residuals left in my background subtracted image. This is not an enormous
problem, as I can mask out the affected regions if I know where they are,
but it is still slightly annoying. Do you think I am doing something
wrong, or is 'background' generally thought to be unsatisfactory near
prominent night-sky lines? Regards,
PierreP.S.: I'm sorry to hassle you with these questions, but I am part of a
very small astrophysics group, and I am one of the only people who use
IRAF for optical spectroscopy, so there aren't many people around who can
give me advice.

 
   

Normal Topic Normal Topic
Sticky Topic Sticky Topic
Locked Topic Locked Topic
New Post New Post
Sticky Topic W/ New Post Sticky Topic W/ New Post
Locked Topic W/ New Post Locked Topic W/ New Post
View Anonymous Posts 
Anonymous users can post 
Filtered HTML Allowed 
Censored Content 
dog allergies remedies cialis 20 mg chilblain remedies


Privacy Policy
Terms of Use

User Functions

Login