Welcome to iraf.net Wednesday, May 01 2024 @ 02:49 PM GMT


 Forum Index > Help Desk > General IRAF New Topic Post Reply
 fitsky with a mask
   
vsravani
 10/02/2013 05:36PM (Read 707 times)  
+----
Newbie

Status: offline


Registered: 10/01/2013
Posts: 10
Hi..
I am trying to obtain the skyvalue using fitsky. There is a bright source in the annulus region that I considered. So, I masked those pixels using fixpix task. The fixpix task created a new fits image. I used this new image as input to the fitsky task. The problem I find here is that, the values in the fitsky output file are exactly the same as the values I got when I used the original image. Can you help me identify where could the problem be.

Thanks,
Sravani

 
Profile Email
 Quote
fitz
 10/22/2013 10:00PM  
AAAAA
Admin

Status: offline


Registered: 09/30/2005
Posts: 4040

Without seeing the data before/after masking and your parameters, it is hard to say what might be happening. Note that some parameters such as fitskypars.annulus are specified in terms of "scale units" and not actually pixels. If I had to guess at this point I would say that you're confusing these values (see datapars.scale) and so you get the same answer because you're not actually measuring an annulus that overlays the modified pixels.

If that doesn't explain it please upload your data to the anonftp at ftp://iraf.noao.edu/pub and post your parameters (don't forget the psets like DATAPARS, e.g. "cl\$this->_split2($m[0]) dpar datapars fitskypars .....").

 
Profile Email
 Quote
   
Content generated in: 0.08 seconds
New Topic Post Reply

Normal Topic Normal Topic
Sticky Topic Sticky Topic
Locked Topic Locked Topic
New Post New Post
Sticky Topic W/ New Post Sticky Topic W/ New Post
Locked Topic W/ New Post Locked Topic W/ New Post
View Anonymous Posts 
Anonymous users can post 
Filtered HTML Allowed 
Censored Content 
dog allergies remedies cialis 20 mg chilblain remedies


Privacy Policy
Terms of Use

User Functions

Login