Submit a Story  :  IRAF Links  :  Past Polls  :  Calendar  :  Advanced Search  
     iraf.net
FAQ
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   Forum SearchForum Search   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

imshift on different platforms

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iraf.net Forum Index -> Applications
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:41 pm    Post subject: imshift on different platforms Reply with quote

Greetings,

I have noticed some irregularities in running the iraf task "imshift"
after upgrading my desktop, running rh9, from PC-IRAF V2.12.1-EXPORT to
V2.12.2a-EXPORT. Using the same input parameters within "imshift" on
the same input file, the output file produced after this upgrade is
noticably different. (the input file is shifted differently) I have
reinstalled V2.12.1 back onto this desktop, and can reproduce my
original results (different than that produced on the V2.12.2a version).

I have further explored running this task with the same input parameters
(on the same input file) on different versions of iraf loaded on
different machines...and have found:

a) rh9 machine running v2.12.1-export; sun machine running v2.11.3; IRIX
machine running v2.11.3 all yield the same results

b) rh9 machine running v2.12.2a-export; fedora core 2 machine running
v2.12.2a-export yield the same results...which are different than that
found in a)


Have other users reported this anomaly when using v2.12.2a - and do you
have any idea what may be causing the problems described?



Thanks in advance for your help,

John Wisniewski





Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://www.mail2forum.com)
Back to top
Guest
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:55 pm    Post subject: imshift on different platforms Reply with quote

Hi John,
What's the definition of "different" in this case? Following the
V2.12.1 release the task was modified to use double precision to fix a
bug where the specified shift was less than the precision of a real, but
otherwise the task is unchanged. Are the differences within the machine
precision or are we talking about major differences?


Regards,
Mike Fitzpatrick




Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://www.mail2forum.com)
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    iraf.net Forum Index -> Applications All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2009 phpBB Group
 Copyright © 2005-2011 iraf.net
 All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Powered By Geeklog 
Created this page in 2.29 seconds