Welcome to iraf.net Friday, April 19 2024 @ 09:44 PM GMT


 Forum Index > Help Desk > Applications New Topic Post Reply
 Optimal vs non-optimal extraction for 2nd order contaminated
   
galtavi
 02/28/2013 09:49AM (Read 1315 times)  
+----
Newbie

Status: offline


Registered: 08/29/2006
Posts: 3
Dear IRAF users, I would like to ask your opinion about this "problem" I found with the optimal extraction of spectra contaminated by second order that may be of general interest.
I want to extract all the flux, also the contaminating one, because I'll apply a procedure to remove it.
I noticed that when the two spectra (first and second order) are slightly separated (because of the cross dispersing effect of the atmosphere at large airmass - but not so large if the seeing is really good) the optimal extraction and the non optimal extraction shows great differences where the second order spectrum has deep features. It seems that the second order spectrum, fainter than the first order spectrum, is less weighted than the first and hence some features (real stellar absorption lines) of the second order, that are well visible in the non-optimal extraction, are lost in the weighted extraction. Non optimal spectra have a larger noise, but preserve all features. I wonder if the correct spectra to be used are the non optimal ones, even if with higher noise and spikes. I think so. Is there a way to preserve the correct flux and all features but also the advantages of the optimal extraction? Cheers
Giuseppe Altavilla
INAF-OABO

 
Profile Email
 Quote
   
Content generated in: 0.03 seconds
New Topic Post Reply

Normal Topic Normal Topic
Sticky Topic Sticky Topic
Locked Topic Locked Topic
New Post New Post
Sticky Topic W/ New Post Sticky Topic W/ New Post
Locked Topic W/ New Post Locked Topic W/ New Post
View Anonymous Posts 
Anonymous users can post 
Filtered HTML Allowed 
Censored Content 
dog allergies remedies cialis 20 mg chilblain remedies


Privacy Policy
Terms of Use

User Functions

Login